According to BitMEX Research, the team is highlighting the re-emergence of rhetoric similar to the past 'large blocker' debate and clarifies it is not a judgment that prior large blockers were wrong nor that current adopters are wrong, source: BitMEX Research on X/Twitter dated Aug 17, 2025. For trading, this statement functions as narrative context rather than a directional call, implying a neutral near-term signal for BTC positioning with no explicit fork or protocol-change claim in this update, source: BitMEX Research on X/Twitter dated Aug 17, 2025. The reference to 'large blockers' points to the historical Bitcoin blocksize dispute documented by BitMEX Research, offering context but no immediate market catalyst in this post, sources: BitMEX Research book The Blocksize War 2021 and BitMEX Research on X/Twitter dated Aug 17, 2025.

According to BitMEX Research, while large blockers have been correct about certain aspects of the Bitcoin scaling debate, they have also been wrong about numerous others. This analysis is critical for traders to understand the historical context of Bitcoin's scaling solutions and its impact on market dynamics. BitMEX Research provides a detailed list evaluating these claims, which can guide trading strategies by highlighting past misconceptions and accurate predictions.

According to BitMEX Research, 'The Blocksize War' book, published in March 2021, details the internal Bitcoin conflict between 2015 and 2017, focusing on 'large blockers' versus 'small blockers'. The book aims for neutrality but acknowledges the tactical success of the small blockers. Recent criticisms by @TheVladCostea, @jamesob, and @VitalikButerin highlight ongoing debates within the community, potentially impacting trading perspectives on Bitcoin scalability issues.